APPLICATION OF CORRECTION COEFFICIENTS TO THE SIGNAL AMPLITUDES FROM REFLECTORS IN ULTRASONIC NON-DESTRUCTIVE TESTING REFERENCE BLOCKS

Keywords: ultrasound, non-destructive testing, reflector, calibration block, reference block, defect, object, method, quality

Abstract

Ultrasonic non-destructive testing (NDT) is one of the most widely used methods for the technical diagnostics of complex engineering structures. A critically important aspect of this method is not only the ability to detect the presence of a defect, but also to quantitatively determine its size, which directly influences the assessment of an object’s technical condition and the decisions regarding its further operation. In traditional ultrasonic NDT systems, the most common approach to estimating defect size is the amplitude method, which is based on comparing the amplitude of the signal reflected from a defect with the amplitude of a reference reflector in a test block. Despite its popularity and apparent simplicity, the amplitude method has significant metrological limitations, primarily associated with the poor reproducibility of amplitudes obtained from nominally identical defect simulators in calibration or reference blocks. Long-term experience in verification, calibration, and production of such blocks shows that signal amplitudes may differ by 4–10 dB even when geometric and technological requirements are met with high precision. Such a deviation is critically important, as it changes the estimated reflecting area by several times, leading to incorrect evaluations of defect size. The main causes of this phenomenon include acoustic inhomogeneity of materials, variations in the actual geometry and surface roughness of the defects, wave and diffraction effects, differences in the formation of the acoustic beam by the transducer, and the influence of ultrasonic attenuation in real materials. Collectively, these factors give rise to the problem of low reproducibility of amplitude parameters, which is one of the key obstacles to improving the accuracy and stability of ultrasonic NDT results. This article proposes a new approach to compensating for such discrepancies, based on comparing the amplitude of the signal reflected from a real flat-bottom hole with that of a signal reflected from a quasi-infinite surface, whose amplitude is stable and reproducible in similar materials. Based on an analysis of acoustic-path equations for the far field, a mathematical model of an amplitude correction factor is formulated. The developed model makes it possible to determine the difference between the theoretical and actual amplitude ratios and to compensate for uncontrolled factors that arise during real measurements. In addition, the study includes an analysis of the sources of uncertainty associated with the proposed correction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ISO 5577:2017 Non-destructive testing — Ultrasonic testing — Vocabulary. Доступно: https://www.iso.org/standard/63662.html

Сазонов П.О., Клименко С.В. Підвищення ефективності ультразвукового неруйнівного контролю складних технічних об’єктів. Вісник ДУ. Journal of Rocket-Space Technology, № 2, Т. 34, 2025, с. 84.

Kyselov, P., & Klymenko, S. (2024). METHOD OF ADJUSTING THE SENSITIVITY OF ULTRASONIC CONTROL OF WELDED JOINTS WITHOUT USING STANDARD SAMPLES. Journal of Rocket-Space Technology, 33(4-28), 68-74. https://doi.org/10.15421/452427

ISO 9712:2021 Non-destructive testing — Qualification and certification of NDT personnel. Доступно: https://www.iso.org/standard/75614.html

СОУ-Н МПЕ 40.1.17.302:2005 Ультразвуковий контроль зварних з’єднань елементів котлів, трубопроводів і посудин.

Krautkrämer J., Krautkrämer H. Werkstoffprüfung mit Ultraschall. Springer-Verlag, 2013. ISBN 3642529615, c. 415–420.

Неруйнівний контроль та діагностика. Довідник / за ред. В.В. Клюєва. Київ: Машинобудування, 1995. ISBN 5-217-02711-81.

Ono K. A Comprehensive Report on Ultrasonic Attenuation of Engineering Materials, Including Metals, Ceramics, Polymers, Fiber-Reinforced Composites, Wood, and Rocks. Applied Sciences, 2020, 10, 2230. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10072230

Lachance F., Giguere D., Rioux P. High Frequency Austenitic Stainless Steel Solution. 15th Asia Pacific Conference for Non-Destructive Testing, 13–17 November 2017, Singapore. e-Journal of Nondestructive Testing, Vol. 23(3). Доступно: https://www.ndt.net/?id=22199

Bloomfield P., Lo W.-J., Lewin P.A. Experimental study of the acoustical properties of polymers utilized to construct PVDF ultrasonic transducers and the acousto-electric properties of PVDF and P(VDF/TrFE) films. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, 2000, 47, 1397–1405. https://doi.org/10.1109/58.883528

ISO/IEC Guide 98-3:2008 Uncertainty of measurement — Part 3: Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM:1995). Доступно: https://www.iso.org/standard/50461.html

EA-4/02 M:2022 Evaluation of the Uncertainty of Measurement in Calibration. Доступно: https://european-accreditation.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/EA-4-02.pdf

Published
2025-12-29
How to Cite
Sazonov, P., & Klymenko, S. (2025). APPLICATION OF CORRECTION COEFFICIENTS TO THE SIGNAL AMPLITUDES FROM REFLECTORS IN ULTRASONIC NON-DESTRUCTIVE TESTING REFERENCE BLOCKS. Journal of Rocket-Space Technology, 34(4), 78-87. https://doi.org/10.15421/452549
Section
Manufacturing Technology and Materials